tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808982736005265049.post5470070403415273981..comments2023-05-15T07:43:30.051-04:00Comments on Against Modern Art: Crocheting Spiritfantazoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09612699707665354289noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808982736005265049.post-64484066528825305882015-12-26T19:53:36.052-05:002015-12-26T19:53:36.052-05:00Two points in my answer to you.First- I am staying...Two points in my answer to you.First- I am staying true to my own experience and however much has and is written about it –myself,as a typical human being have to admit that I never experienced what is meant by “spiritual”.It is not willful diminution of the subject by caricature,as you assumed,but indeed total lack of empirical experience.I know that millions have or claim to have spiritual contact with supernatural entities but I am judging this grave matter by my experience,not by literature,not by testimonies of others .70% of Americans “believe” in aliens visiting Earth.Probably even more “believe” in having contact through prayer with divinity.I have deepest doubt about reality of such contact.Seems like self-hypnosis, intense self-delusion.<br />So-that is to insist that I have no intension to belittle “spirituality” but proceed by my experience.Second part of my reaction-and more to the subject of my blog is evaluating,considering artistic merits of contemporary art that is classed as “spiritual”.In short-it’s very bad.fantazoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09612699707665354289noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808982736005265049.post-27578772873970380712015-12-26T16:17:25.035-05:002015-12-26T16:17:25.035-05:00You caricature a subject, and then follow by criti...You caricature a subject, and then follow by criticism of your own limited understanding of the subject, not the subject itself. A typically adolescent debating tactic that I congratulate you for displaying so wonderfully.fiat mihihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01292123740470024180noreply@blogger.com